EGI SVG Advisories

Advisory-SVG-CVE-2019-5736

Title:   EGI SVG 'ADVISORY' **UPDATE** [TLP:WHITE] 'CRITICAL' risk runc
         malicious container escape affecting Docker, Kubernetes, lxc
         [EGI-SVG-CVE-2019-5736]

Date:    2019-02-13
Updated: 2019-03-01

Affected software and risk
==========================

CRITICAL risk vulnerability concerning runc used in Docker, Kubernetes, lxc

Package : runC/docker
CVE ID  : CVE-2019-5736

A flaw was found in the way runc handled system file descriptors when running
containers.
A malicious container could use this flaw to overwrite contents of the runc
binary and consequently run arbitrary commands on the container host system. [R
1] [R 2].  This affects Docker, Kubernetes, and lxc. Not all sites will be
vulnerable, see mitigation below.

Actions required/recommended
============================

Sites running docker should update urgently, or ensure their site is mitigated
as below, if they have not done so already.

Note that the EGI CSIRT team will not be monitoring this CVE.


Component installation information
==================================

Sites installing docker directly from github may install the updated version [R
3]

**UPDATE 2019-02-26**

RedHat has produced advisories and updates for most supported platforms [R 4],
although for a few platforms they won't fix.

The Scientific Linux extras repository has updated docker and runc packages,
see your local mirror.

Any site using Debian should site [R 5]

The CentOS extras repository has updated docker and runc packages, see your
local mirror.


Mitigation
==========

From the Red Hat advisory: This vulnerability is mitigated by the use of
SELinux in targeted enforcing mode, which completely prevents this
vulnerability from being exploited. The default for SELinux on Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 7 is targeted enforcing mode.


More information
================

This advisory will be updated and a date will be set by which time all running
resources MUST be either patched or have mitigation in place or software
removed.

Note that a proof of concept exploit has been released publicly [R 6]

Use in Docker and Kubernetes  [R 7]

TLP and URL
===========

** WHITE information - Unlimited distribution -
   see https://go.egi.eu/tlp for distribution restrictions **
URL:   https://advisories.egi.eu/Advisory-SVG-CVE-2019-5736

Minor updates may be made without re-distribution to the sites


Comments
========

Comments or questions should be sent to svg-rat  at  mailman.egi.eu

If you find or become aware of another vulnerability which is relevant to EGI
you may report it by e-mail to

report-vulnerability at egi.eu

the EGI Software Vulnerability Group will take a look according to the
procedure defined in [R 8]

Note that this is undergoing revision to fully handle vulnerabilities in the
EOSC-hub era.


References
==========

[R 1] https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-5736

[R 2] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-5736

[R 3] https://github.com/docker/docker-ce/releases/tag/v18.09.2

[R 4] https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-5736

[R 5] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-5736

[R 6] https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2019/q1/129

[R 7] https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/02/11/2

[R 8] https://documents.egi.eu/public/ShowDocument?docid=3145


Credit
======

SVG was alerted to this vulnerability by David Crooks

Timeline
========

Yyyy-mm-dd  [EGI-SVG-CVE-2019-5736 ]

2019-02-11 SVG alerted to this issue by David Crooks
2019-02-11 Acknowledgement from the EGI SVG to the reporter
2019-02-11 Investigation of vulnerability and relevance to EGI carried out by SVG
2019-02-12 EGI SVG Risk Assessment completed
2019-02-12 Advisory drafted
2019-02-13 Advisory sent to sites
2019-03-01 Minor updates to advisory, concerning availability/installation.

Context
=======

This advisory has been prepared as part of the effort to fulfil EGI SVG's
purpose "To minimize the risk to the EGI infrastructure arising from software
vulnerabilities"

The risk is that assessed by the group, according to the EGI SVG issue handling
procedure [R 8] in the context of how the software is used in the EGI
infrastructure. It is the opinion of the group, we do not guarantee it to be
correct. The risk may also be higher or lower in other deployments depending on
how the software is used.

Others may re-use this information provided they:-

1) Respect the provided TLP classification

2) Credit the EGI https://www.egi.eu/ Software Vulnerability Group



On behalf of the EGI SVG,